| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1999-03-11
                 
                 
                IDG.net ueber ENFOPOL
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Dies hier [siehe unten] ist vor zwei Stunden in IDG.net  
erschienen. Morgen publiziert Christiane Schulzki-Hadduti  
auf einer URL, die wir erst nennen werden, wenn es soweit  
ist, eine voluminöse Enfopol-Timeline aller einschlägigen  
Events von 1991-1998, derer wir bis dato hab/haft werden  
konnten. 
 
post/scrypt an die p.t. Fern/meldespezialist/inn/en auf der  
Liste: Wie paranoid soll man den Umstand finden, wenn  
ISDN-Apparate bei - sagen wir - Anrufen vom ISDN-Festnetz  
in Koblenz auf deutsche Mobilfones neuerdings neben  
Fehlverbindungen völlig bescheuerte, fünfstellige   
Rufnummern/anzeigen zur Folge haben? 
 
 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
 
 Mary Lisbeth D'Amico 
IDG News Service, Munich Bureau MUNICH (03/10/99) -  
Privacy advocates in Germany have erected a Web site  
called Freedomforlinks to protest what they perceive as plans  
by the European Union (EU) to allow "legally empowered  
authorities" to put in place European-wide surveillance  
systems. 
 
The protest comes in response to reported plans by the  
European Commission's Council of Justice and Home Affairs  
(JHA) to put into place mechanisms for law-enforcement  
agencies to access all kinds of transmitted messages,  
including data traffic over the Internet. The JHA is the  
organization within the European Council responsible for  
coordinating police, customs and justice activities of the EU's  
15 member states. 
 
The planned surveillance system, called Enfopol, was  
reported on by Telepolis, a German online technology  
magazine that late last year began publishing excerpts over  
the Internet from what it said were top-secret internal EU  
memos. 
 
Contacted about the reports, Telepolis editor Erich Moechel  
said that Telepolis reporters have received numerous copies  
of these memos from more than one source, which he called  
"100-percent reliable." 
 
"People still don't understand the technical aspects (of  
surveillance)," said Moechel, who has authored some of the  
articles on Enfopol. "They still think cellular phones are  
anonymous and they can't imagine what people would even  
do with their data." 
 
Now, German privacy advocates have launched the "Stop  
Enfopol" campaign, publicized on the Freedomforlinks Web  
site (http://www.freedomforlinks.de), to raise public  
awareness of what they see as a real potential threat to  
citizens' privacy. The Web site's sponsors, who call  
themselves online advocates, have asked concerned citizens  
to send e-mails to the European Union's Ombudsman  
(citizen's representative), Jacob Södermann, demanding that  
the issue be clarified. But Södermann has responded with a  
form letter stating that he is not responsible for the matter,  
according to information posted on the Freedomforlinks Web  
site. He has directed the thousands who sent him e-mails to  
contact the European Parliament in Luxembourg, according  
to the Web site authors. 
 
Enfopol surveillance plans target any form of  
telecommunications, be it data, encrypted or not; mobile  
telephony; or communications over the new Iridium system  
and other satellite mobile phone services that may follow,  
according to a document compiled by Moechel based on  
numerous Telepolis reports. "If these plans can be  
implemented, Enfopol will be able to monitor almost every  
communications mode, leaving no gaps," the report said. 
 
If Enfopol becomes legal reality, police forces will get any  
surveillance power they wish, the article said. As soon as the  
surveillance gateways to Internet providers, GSM (Global  
System for Mobile Communications), Iridium (the  
communications network) and other networks are  
established, "legally empowered authorities" other than  
police forces are expected to log on, the article said. 
 
"The danger here is that the European Union is mixing police  
issues with secret service issues," Moechel told IDG News.  
According to the language of the Enfopol documents, the  
interception of messages would be allowed for any "legally  
empowered authority," which he said could mean secret  
service employees as well as police. Citing the internal  
memos published by Telepolis, Moechel suggests that  
Enfopol is even targeting the central terrestrial masterstation  
of the Iridium network in Italy as a main spot from which to  
monitor telecommunications traffic. 
 
Diplomatic sources confirmed that efforts to define  
"interception" efforts were underway, but said that  
statements that a European surveillance system was being  
established were "overdoing it." The origin for the proposal,  
the sources said, was a 1995 resolution, signed by all  
European Union members, which detailed the technical  
requirements that had to be fulfilled to enable interception of  
telecommunications messages in cases where member  
states work together. This is the genesis of the Enfopol  
drafts, the sources confirmed. 
 
This document was a memorandum of understanding with the  
file number Enfopol 112 10037/95, according to Telepolis.  
Although it was signed by all EU members, Telepolis said, it  
was never officially published. A copy was published,  
however, by the British anti-surveillance group Statewatch in  
February 1997. 
 
With the technological progress that occurred over the  
ensuing years, the diplomatic sources said, there has been  
an effort to update this agreement. Talks have gone on  
among what the sources call "police experts" and technical  
experts as to which technical requirements would have to be  
fulfilled to enable data interception. Some kind of final draft  
could be expected around May, the sources said. 
 
When a draft in this area is finalized, the diplomatic sources  
said, ministers of the JHA would have to decide whether it  
would be implemented. And, even if  
adopted, it would be up to individual judges on a national level to decide  
whether to apply the recommendations, the sources said. 
 
Officials with the Justice and Home Affairs Council could not be reached for  
comment. The topic will reportedly be brought up at the next JHA ministers  
meeting, scheduled for March 12 in Brussels, according to Telepolis. 
 
But the diplomatic sources contradict that. "That meeting will discuss  
interception in the framework of criminal investigations, whereas Enfopol has  
to do with interception for intelligence or security reasons," the sources said. 
 
Telepolis' Moechel, however, thinks this simply isn't true. "It's going to be  
the number-one topic among the JHA secretaries when they  
meet," he said. 
 
Telepolis can be reached on the World Wide Web at  
http://www.heise.de/tp/english/default.html.  
 
 
 
 
     
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
Diese q/depesche wurde für telepolis produziert. 
Wir ersuchen bei Übernahme durch Dritte höflich, obige URL zu zitieren 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by  
published on: 1999-03-11 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |