|  | <<  
             ^ 
              >> 
            
              | Date: 2000-06-18 
 
 Cybercrime-Hype der Kyberei-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 
 Dieses Sittenbild aus den so genannten Cybercrime Classes
 aus einer Suburban Law Enforcement Academy in den USA
 wird ausnahmsweise im Volltext wieder gegeben. Sehr schön
 wird nämlich sichtbar, wie sich die von Seiten der gesetzlich
 ermächtigten Behörden invozierten Fälle von Cybercrime bei
 näherem Hinsehen in Schall & Rauch verziehen.
 
 -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-
 By Lewis Z. Koch Special To Inter@ctive Week
 
 The claim was made at a March 21 news conference
 celebrating a gift of goods and services worth $250,000 from
 Microsoft and computer manufacturer Omni Tech to the
 College of DuPage's Suburban Law Enforcement Academy.
 
 Naperville, Ill., Police Detective Mike Sullivan waxed confident
 about how the gift - establishing a new Computer Crimes Lab
 - would aid in teaching Illinois police officers to catch
 cybercriminals, Internet con artists and pedophiles.
 
 As Kirk Heminger, marketing manager at Omni Tech, recalls,
 Sullivan said that in "every class they've ever held, they
 [police officer/students] actually catch someone in an act of
 perpetrating a crime and, so far, every class that they've had,
 one of the students has been able to catch a criminal doing
 what they're doing and convict them."
 
 Heminger enthused: "Where can you go to a class where
 you can get real hands-on experience like that? You're
 actually convicting criminals in a classroom!" He added that
 Sullivan and Randy James, the academy's director, "admit to
 you any time that if you're a supersmart hacker-type guy,
 they're probably not going to catch you. Randy told us: 'We
 just want to catch the dumb ones.' "
 
 Sullivan, who teaches the computer crime class, told those
 gathered at the celebration that his police officer/students
 would pose as children and log on to pornographic Web sites
 or chat rooms where Internet pedophiles prey on the young;
 once the predators reveal themselves, they can be
 investigated and arrested.
 
 Catching those who use the Internet to victimize children is a
 worthy cause. So, too, is protecting children from being
 tortured, even murdered, by their parents or caretakers. In a
 world of limited police resources, should cops be patrolling
 cyberspace for "dumb" pedophiles, or real space, stopping
 parents who, by the hundreds of thousands each year, maim
 and murder their own children?
 
 Show me
 
 I wanted to attend class and see what the students did, what
 they were taught - exactly - so that I could inform the public
 where its resources are going and to what ends. If the public
 wants to hunt down the "dumb ones," so be it. But the public
 should know a choice exists between catching the dumb
 ones and the more difficult task of catching the smart ones -
 the hackers capable of wreaking havoc on the Internet, using
 computers to steal millions, if not billions, of dollars.
 
 When Sullivan claimed that it was easy to track someone
 down - as easy as checking on a license plate - I wanted to
 see him do it, or see someone in class do it. And I had other
 questions: What was being taught about the legal concept of
 entrapment? What about maintaining the scientific validity of
 the computer forensic evidence to ensure its admissibility in
 court?
 
 So, can I attend school?
 
 No. No civilians allowed; only "sworn police officers."
 
 Finally, I was told I could come to class - for one hour on one
 day, and four hours on another. That wasn't satisfactory. If I
 was going to write fairly about the class, then I had to attend
 all the class sessions. I wouldn't review a book without
 reading it in its entirety, nor would I critique a class having
 only attended part of it.
 
 I changed my tack: I asked to see James' and Sullivan's
 curriculum vitae. Would anyone refuse to provide his or her
 educational and professional background on the grounds of
 competency or excellence? James and Sullivan refused.
 
 Student evaluations of previous classes? No.
 
 Oh, yeah, and those student-caught cybercriminals Sullivan
 had bragged about?
 
 Naperville's Chief of Police, David E. Dial, Sullivan's boss,
 didn't know of any such arrests, nor did Dial's second-in-
 command. According to Dial, Naperville's serious crime rates
 "are incredibly low when compared to the national average."
 Dial noted the department does receive complaints "about
 the way we handle parking enforcement."
 
 What's more, the DuPage County prosecutor's office couldn't
 cite any arrests or convictions stemming from the work of the
 Academy's cybercrime class, nor could the Illinois Attorney
 General's office.
 
 College President Michael Murphy listened to my requests
 for information for more than half an hour and said he would
 get back to me that day. He didn't. He hasn't.
 
 The entire Illinois education bureaucracy refused to answer
 any requests for information about the college or the
 Suburban Law Enforcement Academy, all the way up to and
 including the governor's office. The College of DuPage Board
 of Trustees? Five of seven members failed to return a phone
 call; they still hadn't called a week later. One had an unlisted
 number. One returned the call, and said she would
 investigate and have Murphy call me back. Never happened.
 
 Who's overseeing the classroom teaching, the curriculum?
 No one at the college - no one in the state, it appears. This
 cybercrime course seems to be accountable to no one.
 
 Finally, one who gets it
 
 James L. Fisher is a world-class educator who writes about
 leadership and organization in higher education. His book,
 The Power of the Presidency, was nominated for a Pulitzer
 and his latest book, Presidential Leadership: Making a
 Difference, was hailed as a must-read for college presidents
 and boards of trustees. Fisher's writing is also published in
 The New York Times.
 
 Fisher and five others from across the country did a review of
 the College of DuPage, which, since its founding in 1967, has
 become the largest single-campus community college in the
 U.S. It has graduated more than 0.5 million students and has
 a budget of more than $124 million.
 
 The review was tough, but fair, and included both praise for
 and scathing denouncements of the college, which the
 authors felt had the potential to be first-rank, but was instead
 vacillating between excellence and mediocrity.
 
 I told Fisher that I had wanted to sit in on the cybercop class.
 There was absolutely no equivocation, no hesitation, when he
 said: "I think it's something worthy of investigation and
 reporting. I don't disagree at all with what you're doing. I think
 it's appropriate."
 
 When I recited the efforts the college and the bureaucracy
 had undertaken to stymie me, he had a one-word response:
 "Ludicrous!"
 
 Yes, that's exactly the word for it.
 
 Source
 http://www.zdnet.com/intweek/stories/columns/0,4164,2588873,00.html
 -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 edited by Harkank
 published on: 2000-06-18
 comments to office@quintessenz.at
 subscribe Newsletter
 - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
 <<  
                   ^ 
                    >>
 |  |  |  |