|
search / subscribe / upload / contact |
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
|
||
| RSS-Feed Depeschen |  |
|
|
||
|
||
Date: 2001-07-25
AU: [2600 Australia] und Cybercrime ebendort-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- mit computer-sicherheit, elektronischem schnickschnack, kommunikation und technik im allgemeinen befasst. ----- forwarded text starts here ------ 2600 Australia would like to announce the public release of its submission to the Australian Senate Legal and Constitutional Legislation Commitee inquiry into the provisions of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001. http://www.2600.org.au/Cybercrime-Submission.pdf (121k) http://www.2600.org.au/Cybercrime-Submission.doc (91k) (This release has been authorised by the Secretary to the Committee as at 24th July, 2001) Included here is the Executive Summary: a. 2600 Australia believes the term "cybercrime" is so broadly defined and so frequently misdefined that legislation such as the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 will fail to achieve the desired result if only through failure to address some issues and through the addition of unnecessary complexity to existing laws. b. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 place in grave danger the robust debate, discussion and disclosure that the computer security industry relies so heavily upon. c. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 will unintentionally place a significant number of computer security industry professionals at risk because of poorly defined or overly broad definitions of certain acts, objects and intentions. d. 2600 Australia believes that a number of parts of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 place in grave danger the common law privilege against self incrimination. e. 2600 Australia believes that an alternative response to the perceived threat of "cybercrime" is required, including but not limited to additional training for law enforcement, more rigorous ACCC scrutiny of security claims made in respect of products and services and the formation of a national body to oversee computer security matters. f. For these reasons and others as discussed below, 2600 Australia canot support the passage of the Cybercrime Bill, 2001 in its current or any substantially similar form. ----- forwarded text ends here ------ -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- edited by Harkank published on: 2001-07-25 comments to office@quintessenz.at subscribe Newsletter - -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
|
|
|
 |
CURRENTLY RUNNING |
q/Talk 1.Juli: The Danger of Software Users Don't Control
|
|
|
!WATCH OUT! |
bits4free 14.Juli 2011: OpenStreetMap Erfinder Steve Coast live in Wien
|
|