| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 2000-10-29
                 
                 
                NZ: Ermaechtigung fuer Abhoerpolizei
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      Warum sollte es im ECHELON-Staat Neuseeland anders  
zugehen als etwa im UK? Das neue Gesetz enthält unter  
anderem auch eine  Verpflichtung für alle Netzwerkbetreiber,  
ihre Netze abhörtauglich zu machen - hurra Globalisierung,  
rund um die Welt spielt sich dasselbe Affentheater ab! 
 
post/post/scrypt:  Dass diese Mail jetzt schon relayed  
wurde, obwohl das Original erst morgen [30. Okt.] erscheint,  
hat auch was mit Globalität zu tun. 
-.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-  -.-. --.-   
Date sent: 	Sun, 29 Oct 2000 07:07:56 -0500 From: 	David  
Banisar <banisar@privacy.org> Subject: 	NZ Proposes RIP  
Act To: 	Global Internet Liberty Campaign <gilc- 
plan@gilc.org> Send reply to: 	gilc-plan@gilc.org 
 
TOP STORY 
 
MONDAY, 30 OCTOBER 2000 Sweeping powers for spy  
agencies  
 
Police and government spy agencies are pushing for major  
new surveillance powers - including the ability to intercept e- 
mails. 
 
In a move the Council for Civil Liberties labels a "major and  
disturbing intrusion" new surveillance laws are being planned  
which will allow police and intelligence agencies to hack  
covertly into home computers and intercept email and other  
electronic communication. 
 
Researcher and author Nicky Hager, says the proposed  
legislation strongly resembles the British Regulation of  
Investigatory Powers Act passed amid huge controversy  
three months ago. 
 
But he says unlike the British experience, the New Zealand  
legislation is being slipped through in stages, as extensions  
of present laws. The first is to be tabled in parliament in  
about 10 days. 
 
The laws were devised under the National government and  
can be traced back to a push by the FBI in the United States  
for standardised spy systems to intercept mobile phones and  
emails. 
 
The changes are now being promoted by Associate Justice  
Minister Paul Swain, and would also impose "requirements"  
on Internet service providers and phone companies to co- 
operate with intelligence agencies and police and install  
systems to assist spying on their customers. 
 
Hager, whose 1996 book on the global Echelon surveillance  
network prompted a year-long investigation by the European  
parliament, said the public had a right to demand proof that  
the new intrusive powers were so crucial that individuals had  
to give up privacy and freedoms. 
 
He said the way the changes were being introduced,  
piecemeal and in secret, was "a model of bad government". 
 
The first legislation expands the interception powers of the  
police and the Government Communications Security Bureau  
to cover all forms of electronic communications (including  
email, faxes and text messaging) and, for the Security  
Intelligence Service as well, to cover hacking into computer  
systems to view and copy people's files. 
 
This would be achieved by amending the Crimes Act to make  
it illegal to intercept emails or hack into computers - and then  
exempting all the intelligence and law enforcement agencies  
from the new law. 
 
The legislation will also increase the status of the GCSB,  
moving its existing powers into the Crimes Act. 
 
The other half of the plan is changes to the  
Telecommunications Act, requiring telephone companies to  
make systems "interceptable". 
 
Hager says New Zealand officials secretly agreed to  
implement the surveillance changes after attending a meeting  
at the FBI headquarters in Quantico, south of Washington  
DC, in 1993. 
 
Swain says the driving force of the law changes is the wish to  
protect privacy because there is no legislation to say  
"wandering into someone's internal communications system  
is illegal". 
 
The exemptions for the government agencies came later, he  
said. 
 
 
 
 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by Harkank 
published on: 2000-10-29 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |